Preview

Orientalistica

Advanced search

The historical continuum of Jerusalem: the inseparability of time and space, past and present, history and politics

https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2021-4-1-096-120

Abstract

Over the long centuries and nowadays the historical concept and political status of Jerusalem remain the most acute problem of relations between the peoples and states of the Middle East, Arabs and Jews, Israel and the Arab Palestinian state. The poignancy of the problem, the arguments of the opposing sides, are mainly rooted in conflicting interpretations of the history of Jerusalem and its holy places. The article presents a view of the history of Jerusalem as a process that began before the formation of the historical consciousness of the Arabs and Jews but used to continuously influence its shaping during the struggle for the city between powerful political forces standing behind the claims of various congregations. The article examines the written evidence of the shrines of Jerusalem that existed before the construction of the First Temple; selected archaeological data are used for additional verification of written sources. Recent proposals for a solution to the political status of Jerusalem are placed in the context of ideas about its cultural and historical significance.  Particular attention is paid to the importance of Jerusalem in the history of the formation of religious doctrine and ritualism in Islam; a distinctive opinion is substantiated by the author concerning the reasons of the initial orientation of the Muslim prayer ritual towards Jerusalem; the existence of perceptions of the shrines of Jerusalem as sacred objects, recognized in the religious and ritual traditions of the Semitic peoples – the ancestors of Jews and Arabs – is established. On the ground of research findings the inseparability of history, culture, spatial limits and political status of the city of Jerusalem as an organic whole and a system is argued, the breach of the balance of which is claimed to inevitably destroy the integrity of the characteristics of Jerusalem in the history of the region, various peoples and all of humanity. The search for a solution to the Jerusalem problem is seen as interaction and the development of a model that recognizes and balances three factors of influence: 1) ideas about the importance of Jerusalem in the national historical narrative of Arabs and Jews; 2) the concept that asserted the consideration of the beginning of the cultural history of Jerusalem as a common Middle Eastern religious centre; and 3) the range of various political solutions proposed for the settlement of the problems of disputed territories in international relations with the assumption of the feasibility of fundamentally new models of solution.

About the Author

Farda Muharram Asadov
Institute of Oriental Studies after academician Z. M. Bunyadov; Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences
Azerbaijan

Farda Muharram oglu Asadov – Ph. D. habil., Ph. D. (Hist.), Head of the Department of the History and Economics of Arab countries; Associate Professor of the University.

Baku


Competing Interests:

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.



References

1. The status of Jerusalem. New York, UN Publication; 1997. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20060729191918/http://www.un.org/russian/peace/palestine/jerusalem/index.html. (In Russ.) Accessed: 10 December 2020.

2. The Current Time (Nastoyashee Vremya). 25 March 2019. Available at: https://www.currenttime.tv/a/golan-heights-israel-usa/29841373.html. (In Russ.) Accessed: 10 December 2020.

3. Panov A. Deal of the century or Joint PR? Novaya Gazeta, № 10, 31 January, 2020. Available at: https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2020/01/30/83687-sdelka-veka-ili-sovmestnyy-piar. (In Russ.) Accessed: 10 December 2020.

4. Flower K. ‘Massive’ ancient wall uncovered in Jerusalem. CNN-World [Internet]. 2009. Accessed October 11, 2020. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/09/04/israel.wall.discovered/index.html#. Accessed: 10 December 2020.

5. History of Jerusalem: Timeline for the History of Jerusalem (4500 BCE – Present) 1999. Available at: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/timeline-for-the-history-ofjerusalem-4500-bce-present. Accessed: 10 December 2020.

6. Binz S. J. Jerusalem, the Holy City. U. S. A., Mystic, CT: Twenty-Third Publications; 2005. 128 p.

7. Knabe G. S. Historical Time and Historical Space in the culture of Ancient Rome. The Ancient Rome and its Culture Vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka; 1985, pp. 105–166. (In Russ.)

8. Klima Jo. Society and Culture in the Ancient Mesopotamia. Praga: Academia, Izdatelstvo Chekhoslovatskoi Akademii Nauk and Artia; 1967. 270 p. (In Russ.)

9. Wright J. K. The Geographical Lore of the Time of the Crusades; a Study in the History of Medieval Science and Tradition in Western Europe. Moscow: Nauka; 1988. 478 p. (In Russ.)

10. Kitab al-Masalik wa’l-Mamalik auctore Abu’l-Kasim Obaidallah Ibn Abdallah Ibn Khordadhbeh et Excerpta e Kitab al-Kharadj auctore Kodama ibn Dja’far. Lugduni Batavorum: E. J. Brill; 1889. 308 p. (In Arabic)

11. Bickerman E. J. Chronology of the Ancient World. Moscow: Nauka; 1976. 336 p. (In Russ.)

12. Dyakonov I.M. Basics of the Babylonian and Assyrian Chronology. In: BickermanE.J. (ed.) Chronology of the Ancient World Moscow: Nauka; 1976, pp. 307–320. (In Russ.)

13. Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin Books; 1992. 418 p.

14. Kennedy H. The Prophet and the Age of the Caliphates: the Islamic Near East from the Sixth to Eleventh Century. [n. p.]: Pearson & Longman; 2004. 419 p.

15. Irvin R. [Review by:] Asali K. J. Jerusalem in History. Ed. by Buckhurst Hill. Essex: Scorpion Publishers; 1989. Journal of Royal Asiatic Society. S. III. Vol. 2. Pt. 1, (April 1992), pp. 66–69.

16. Shifman I. Sh. The Old Testament and its World Moscow: Politizdat; 1987. 239 p. (In Russ.)

17. Bolshakov O. G. The History of the Khaliphate. Vol. 1: Islam in Arabia (570–633). Moscow: Nauka; GRVL; 1989. 312 p. (In Russ.)

18. Afanas’yeva I. M., Diakonov I. M, Veinberg I. P. The Near Eastern Culture in the 1st Millennium BC. Diakonov I. M., Neronova V. D., Sventitskaya I. S. (eds) History of the Ancient World. The Acme of the Ancient Societies. Moscow: Nauka; GRVL; 1982, pp. 95–128. (In Russ.)

19. McCormick C. M. Palace and Temple: A Study of Architectural and Verbal Icons. Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter; 2002. 221 p.

20. Desnitsky A. S. The history of Ancient Israel as a modern problem. Orientalistica. 2019;2(1):134–149. (In Russ.) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2019-2-1-134-149. (In Russ.)

21. Countries of the Eastern Mediterranean in the I-II millennium BC. e. 9. Migration of trans-river tribes (‘Ibrim). In: Bongard-Levin G. M. (ed.) History of the Ancient East Pt. 2: Near East; Egypt. Moscow: Nauka; GRVL; 1988, pp. 269–294. (In Russ.)

22. Tokarev S. A. (ed.). The World Mythology Encyclopaedia (Mify Narodov Mira). Vol. 1. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopedia; 1987. (In Russ.)

23. Tantlevskiy I. R. History of Israel and Judaea before the Destruction of the First Temple. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo SPb Universiteta; 2005. 402 p. (In Russ.)

24. Shifman I. Sh. The Nabataean State and its Culture. Pages from the Culture History of the Pre-Islamic Arabia. Moscow: GRVL; 1976. 195 p. (In Russ.)

25. Gordon C. H. The Mythology of Chanaanites. In: Diakonov I. M. (transl. from English, foreword, comm.) Mythology of the Ancient World. Moscow: Nauka; GRVL; 1977, pp. 199–232. (In Russ.)

26. Desnitskiy A. S. Tsar David mejdu mifom i istoriey. Orientalistica. 2019;2(3):710–723. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2019-2-3-710-723. (In Russ.)

27. Piotrovskiy M. B. Legends from the Holy Qur’an. Moscow: Nauka; GRVL; 1991. 219 p. (In Russ.)

28. Krachkovskiy I. Yu. (transl., comments) Qur’an. 2 ed. Moscow: Nauka; 1986. 727 p. (In Russ.)

29. Ashgar M. S. Al-Kur’an al-karim wa bi-l-hamish zubdat at-tafsir Fath al-Qadir wa huwaa mukhtasar min tafsir imam al-Shaukani. Dimashk: ad-Dar al-muttahada; 1991. 846 p. (In Arabic)

30. Porokhova V. (transl. of meanings, comments) Quran. Tegeran: International publishing company; 1997. 800 p. (In Russ.)

31. Osmanov M.-N. O. (transl. from Arabic, comments) Quran. Qum: Ansariyan publications; [w. y.]. 580 p. (In Russ.)

32. Grunebaum G. E. von. Classical Islam. A History. (600–1258). Transl. from Engl. by I. M. Dizhur. Moscow: Nauka; GRVL; 1988. 216 p. (In Russ.)

33. Bell R. The origins of Islam in its Christian Environment. London: Routledge; 1968. 224 p.

34. Oppenheim A. L. Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization. 2 ed. Transl. from Engl. by M. N. Botvinnik. Moscow: Nauka; GRVL; 1990. 320 p. (In Russ.)

35. Abu Arafeh J. How Israel’s arcahelogical excavations work to rewrite the history of Jerusalem. Middle East Eye [Internet]. 2020 Oct 28. Available at: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/jerusalem-israeli-tunnels-archaeology-history-palestinians-silwan


Supplementary files

1. Supplementary files_Orientalistica-Peer review info-The historical continuum of Jerusalem
Subject
Type Other
Download (258KB)    
Indexing metadata

For citation:


Asadov F.M. The historical continuum of Jerusalem: the inseparability of time and space, past and present, history and politics. Orientalistica. 2021;4(1):96-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2021-4-1-096-120

Views: 494


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2618-7043 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0738 (Online)