Preview

Orientalistica

Advanced search

Ancient Indian chronotope in Pali and Sanskrit sources

https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2020-3-4-1097-1113

Abstract

The author analyses the chronotope problem in the Ancient Indian texts written in Sanskrit (“Manu-Smriti”, “Arthashastra”, “Ramayana”, “Brihadaranyaka-Upanishad”) and Pali (“Simavisodhani”) languages. The “chronotope” is a category introduced by the Soviet scholar Mikhail Bakhtin (1895–1975). This category describes how configurations of time and space are represented in language and discourse. In particular, the author analyses the problem of the ideas of space regarding the “country” and “Kingdom” categories. The research has yielded two main results. In the first instance, the so-called “sacred space” in the ancient Indian texts is always represented in form of a square (or rectangle). It is similar to what is called a Vastu-mandala in the Vastu-Vidya, the traditional science of building and construction. In the second instance, thе so-called “sacred space” in the ancient Indian texts written in Sanskrit and Pali is associated with a set of heterogeneous phenomena: space, socium, time, etc. In a similar passage taken from the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad the author discovers a remarkable phenomenon. In describing the spatial reality, the number of times where one refers to the category of “time” is higher than that, which refers to the spatial category. This fact invites a conclusion: in ancient Indian culture, the categories of space and time are inseparable and always go together. Therefore, the ancient Indian culture definitively included a category of the chronotope. As a result of this discovery one should not any longer take into consideration the common topic of the “ atemporal” character of the ancient Indian culture.

About the Author

Yevgeniy G. Vyrschikov
Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Yevgeniy G. Vyrschikov ‒ Ph. D., Senior Research Fellow, Department of History and Culture of the Ancient East

Moscow

 



References

1. Sīmavisodhanī. Chattha Sanghayana Tipitaka. – URL: http//www.tipitaka.org/chattha (In Pali)

2. Vyrschikov Ye. G. Two images of the city in Pali texts: cultural representations in historical perspective. Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS. 2018;(3):169–177 (In Russ.)

3. Manava Dharma-śastra. The code of Manu. Critically cd. by J. Jolly (1887). London: Kessinger Publishing, LLC; 2010. 382 р.

4. Vigasin A. A. Ancient India – from source to history. Мoskow: Vostochnaya Literatura; 2007. (In Russ.)

5. Kangle R. (ed.) The Kautilīya Arthaśāstra. Part I. Delhi: Shri Jainendra Press; 1986. 343 р.

6. The principal Upanishads. Ed. with introduction, text, translation and notes by

7. S. Radhakrishnan (1888). London: India HarperCollins; 1994. 958 р.

8. Bhatt G. H. (gen. ed.) The Ramayana of Valmiki. In 7 vols. U.P. Shah, Baroda: The Oriental Institute; 1960. Vols. 2–3. 584 р.; 416 р.

9. Vertogradova V. V. Architecture. Culture of Ancient India. Мoskow: GRVL; 1975, pp. 293–314. (In Russ.)

10. T’ulina E. V. Space, its “testing” and veneration in the rites of consecration of sculpture and architecture. India–Tibet: the text and the phenomenology of culture. Мoskow: Yazyki slav’anskoy kul’tury; 2012, pp. 226–241 (In Russ.)

11. Syrkin A. Ya. (Transl., research and comments) The Upanishads. Мoskow: Vostochnaya literatura; 2000. 784 р. (In Russ.)

12. Romanov V. N. (transl., introd. and note) Shatapatha-brahmana. Book X: secret. Мoskow: Vostochnaya literatura; 2010. 198 р. (In Russ.)

13. Romanov V. N. Historical development of culture. Мoskow: Nauka; 1991. 190 р. (In Russ.)


For citation:


Vyrschikov Y.G. Ancient Indian chronotope in Pali and Sanskrit sources. Orientalistica. 2020;3(4):1097-1113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2020-3-4-1097-1113

Views: 157


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2618-7043 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0738 (Online)