The European linguistic tradition as compared to other traditions
Abstract
The modem teaching of language as a cultural and social phenomenon goes back directly to the European linguistic tradition. This tradition was finally shaped in the Hellenistic era in the city of Alexandria. However, other traditions have formed at different times in the world. Among them the Indian, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, which share many common features. With the exception of the European linguistic tradition, they all had a common starting point. According to it, the «real» language has always been one (the idea of comparing languages has not been developed). This language does not change, although it can be corrupted. Its study is necessary for practical needs, in the first instance, to establish the norms. For a long time, the European tradition was not the most developed. In comparison, Indian and Arabic phonetics were much more detailed. Besides, in the European tradition there were there no complete dictionaries. The grammar dealt with only one category, i.e. the word. However, starting from 13th to 18th cent., the linguistic tradition in Europe underwent three major radical changes. In the 13th-14th centuries the modistae school began to compose philosophical grammars that did not aim any practical needs. In the 16th - 17th cent., was developed the idea of the multiplicity of languages and subsequently the possibility of comparing between them. In the 13th cent., was developed a notion of historicism appeared. All this led to the fact that the European linguistic tradition from the beginning of the 19th cent. became world-wide acknowledged.
Keywords
About the Author
V. M. AlpatovRussian Federation
Vladimir M. Alpatov - Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof., Head of the Department of Languages of East and Southeast Asia, Head of the Research Center for National-Language Relations of the Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
References
1. Sebeok T. A. (ed.) Current Trends in Linguistics. Vol. 13: Historiography of linguistics. The Hague; Paris: Mouton; 1975.
2. Desnitskaya A. Katsnelson S. (ed.) History of linguistic doctrines and teachings. The Ancient World. Leningrad: Nauka; 1980. (In Russ.)
3. Desnitskaya A. Katsnelson S. (ed.) History of linguistic doctrines and teachings. Eastern Countries. The Middle Ages. Leningrad: Nauka; 1981. (In Russ.)
4. Alpatov V. M. Towards the comparative study of linguistic traditions (stating the problem). Voprosy Jazykoznanija = Topics in the study of language. 1990;(2):13-25. (In Russ.)
5. Alpatov V. M. History of linguistic doctrines and teachings. 4th ed. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kultury; 2005. (In Russ.)
6. Shor R. O. Language and Society. 3rd ed. Moscow: Lenand; 2009. (In Russ.)
7. Meie A. A Comparative study of Indo-European languages. AN Introduction. Moscow; Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo; 1938. (In Russ.)
8. Robins R. H. Ancient and Medieval Grammatical Theory in Europe with Particular Reference to Modern Linguistic Doctrine. London: Bell; 1951.
9. Robins R. H. A Short History of Linguistics. Bloomington; London; 1968.
10. Katenina T. E., Rudoi V. I. History of linguistic doctrines in Ancient India. In: Desnitskaya A. Katsnelson S. (ed.) History of linguistic doctrines and teachings. The Ancient World. Leningrad: Nauka; 1980, pp. 66-91. (In Russ.)
11. Tronskii I. M. Essays on the history of the Latin language. Moscow; Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences; 1953. (In Russ.)
12. Bakhtin M. M. The oeuvres by Francois Rabelais and the popular culture in Rennaisance and Middle Ages. In: Bakhtin M. M. Collected Works. Vol. 4 (2). Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kultury; 2010. (In Russ.)
13. Freidenberg O. M. (ed.). Ancient theories of the language and literary style. Moscow; Leningrad: OGIZ, Sotsekgiz; 1936. (In Russ.)
14. Matthews P. H. What Can We Conclude? In: Dixon R. M. W., Aikhenvald A. Y. (ed.) Word. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003, pp. 281-295.
15. Aristotle. Collected Works. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl; 1978. (In Russ.)
16. Blumfild L. The Language. Moscow: Progress; 1968. (In Russ.)
17. Matthews P. H. Morphology. London; New York: Cambridge University Press; 1974.
18. Perelmuter I. A. The Modistae linguistic doctrines and teachings. In: Desnitskaya A. V. (ed.) History of linguistic doctrines and teachings. The Late Middle Ages. St Petersburg: Nauka; 1991, pp. 7-66. (In Russ.)
19. Saussure F. de. Works on the history of language. Moscow: Progress; 1977. (In Russ.)
20. Pasternak E. L. The genesis of main directions in the French linguistic research in the 18th cent. Habil. Thesis (linguistic studies). Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.)
For citation:
Alpatov V.M. The European linguistic tradition as compared to other traditions. Orientalistica. 2019;2(4):1009-1020. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2019-2-4-1009-1020